“A set of principles concerned with the
nature and appreciation of beauty.” Also, “the branch of philosophy which deals with questions of beauty and artistic taste.”
The definition of aesthetic, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary,
is: of or relating to art or beauty.
According to Oxford Dictionaries,
an aesthetic is “a set of principles
underlying the work of a particular artist or artistic movement”, such as the
Cubist aesthetic. As such, aesthetic theory is often divided into branches such
as art theory, film theory, and music theory.
The word aesthetic is derived from the Greek αἰσθητικός
(aisthetikos, meaning "sensitive, perceptive"), and had
originally been used merely to mean “sensibility” or “responsiveness to stimulation
of the senses”. It received its contemporary meaning of “taste” or “sense” of
beauty by Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten.
The German philosopher first introduced the
concept of good and bad “taste” (and as such, good and bad art) in his book Die Metaphysik.
He defined “taste” as the ability to judge according to the senses, instead of
according to the intellect.
Originally published in Latin in 1739, his
concept received a lot of criticism from other philosophers, including Immanuel Kant, though the latter eventually
came to conform to Baumgarten’s usage of the word and himself employed the word
aesthetic to mean the judgment of taste or the estimation of the beautiful.
ART
Generally, art (or “fine art”) is when the artist’s skill is used to express his or her creativity, or to engage the audience’s aesthetic sensibilities.
If this skill is being used in a functional
object, it is more likely to be considered a craft rather than art; when the skill is being used in a commercial
or industrial way it may be considered design
instead of art, though the term “applied art” may also be appropriate.
Typically, art implies no function other
than to please the eye or communicate an idea.
For many centuries it was implied that all art
aims at beauty, but art movements such as Cubism and Dadaism struggled against
the conception that beauty is central to the definition of art – with great
success.
After the works of such artists as Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol
one could believe that “art” is basically a sociological category, and that
whatever art schools, museums and artists define as art is considered such
regardless of formal definitions. After all, most people didn’t consider the
depiction of a store-bought urinal
or Brillo Box
to be art until Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol (respectively) placed them in
the context of art (i.e. the art gallery), which then provided the association
of these objects with the associations that define art.
However, there are other possible
definitions, such as that suggested by proceduralists:
That it is the process by which a work of art is created or viewed that makes it
art, not any inherent feature of an object, or how well received it is by the
institutions of the art world after its introduction to society at large. Leo
Tolstoy, on the other hand, claims in “What is art?” (1897) that what decides
whether or not something is art is how it is experienced by its audience, not
by the intention of its creator.
There are a number of other theories,
ranging from the practical (the instrumentalist theory of art, Monroe Beardsley) to the obscure (“Art is an anti-destiny”, André Malraux).
In general, one can agree that the definition of art is limited by both era and culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment